Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current Restore this Version View Version History

« Previous Version 5 Next »

\uD83D\uDDD3 Date

\uD83D\uDC65 Participants

\uD83E\uDD45 Goals

  • Collectively look at the work done in FY24 and focus on gathering feedback on how our team works moving forward

\uD83D\uDDE3 Discussion topics

Item

Presenter

Notes

Expectation Setting

Becki and Netal

  • Key Message (Netal):

    • Goal is to collectively look at the work done in FY24 and focus on gathering feedback on how our team works moving forward

    • Let’s focus on items within our control

    • We are not looking at current process for review - discussing specific themes

  • Meeting Format

    • What are the action items to improve on these themes?

    • 5 minutes to discuss gap (Netal)

    • 15 minutes to discuss solutions/action items (Becki to Moderate)

Topics

Team

  • Versioning Strategy and Accountability

    • Gaps and Problems:

      • There is not currently a defined versioning strategy that is being used

    • Questions:

      • What’s the difference between versioning and tagging?

        • Tagging

          • aliasing a pointer to a specific instance of an artifact

          • Future topic for lunch and learn?

    • Action Items

      • Team needs to define, document, and standardize:

        • Action Items for Chris Cadden and Jesús Rangel - Document Outsystems vs. Non-Outsystems, including definitions and vocabulary

      • In depth Dependencies Planning and team agreement

        • Potential idea: More frequent releases

          • Not stacking multiple releases

            • Increases amount of bugs and time pressure

          • Outsystems can slow down based on smaller releases

        • Need to determine what features can be worked on simultaneously

  • Idea/Question: How do we get to the state of more frequent releases

    • Focus on this idea as we move forward - we want to get to this state

    • Is branching possible?

      • This is limited within Outsystems

  • Documentation and Accountability

    • Dev Documentation (Design checklist)

      • Needs to be created for OS and non-OS projects

      • Accountability needed - documentation alone is not OK, we need to commit

    • Project Management (Project Plans)

    • Testing (UAT Documentation)

    • Feedback:

      • Question: Will Grecia be involved in Design checklists?

        • Yes - Great idea

      • Outsystems' selling point is reusable components - we can leverage this

        • WebDev doesn’t have standardized component library

          • Everyone - document successful tools and reusable resources

      • Thinking point for the Devs: What is the best way to track or document shared components as more are added

        • Outsystems - Internal Forge and documentation on best practices

  • Technical Debt and Accountability

    • Estimation

      • Lessons Learned from SDF and CEA

      • Where were the Gaps?

        • Team to review estimates before beginning work using the three day planning period

    • Commitments

      • Sprint Goals should be commitments from the dev team and reviewed in retrospectives

    • Roles & Responsibilities

      • Dev and QA: Responsible for meeting to discuss work breakdown

        • Everyone to take turns stepping up to help schedule work

    • Defect Reduction

      • Clarify requirements before work begins

      • Need to focus on Code Review and Unit Testing

      • QA and Dev need to communicate directly and do it right the first time

      • Idea: Separate Accessibility and Mobile into its own user story when planning?

      • QA and BA to collaborate on Test Cases ahead of the sprint

      • QA and Dev feel at odds and not part of the same team - that relationship is not working like it should

        • How should it be working?

          • Better Communication - easy to fix defects or things the team could fix together could be avoided and save a lot of time

          • Accessibility - need to work together to help get Dev team on the same page

      • QA to demonstrate the process of testing

  • Deployments and Accountability

    • Versioning Strategy

      • OS vs. Non-OS

    • When will we do deployments?

      • incorporate CAB

      • Thursday Releases

  • Standards and Accountability

    • Development Standards (Outsystems)

      • Design and Implementation

      • Security and Accessibility

        • All teams developing applications and testing need to be responsible and accountable for Security Planning and standards

✅ Action items

Versioning Strategy and Accountability

Documentation and Accountability

  • Chris Cadden to review the design standard documents in the weekly dev meeting
    • Development team MUST adhere to defined processes
  • Chris Cadden to collaborate with Grecia to formalize standard documentation of design
  • Team to commit to documenting reusable, successful tools in the moment
  • Netal Patel and dev team to prioritize working with OutSystems to research/spin up an internal forge
  • Selene Gutierrez and QA team to create standard documentation on process and templates/checklist for UAT
  • Team to help Rebecca Schneider make Project Plan a core part of the process

Standards and Accountability

Technical Debt and Accountability

  • Rebecca Schneider to present metrics based on estimation vs. actual during retrospectives moving forward
  • Netal Patel and Rebecca Schneider to define metrics to be reviewed
  • Netal Patel to investigate Accessibility Training Opportunities between QA, Dev and Accessibility
  • QA team to share their testing process
  • Team to commit to more active communication and review in retrospectives

Deployments and Accountability

  • Rebecca Schneider to review project plans on Mondays to allow for review and feedback of deployment schedule

Standards and Accountability

  • Team to commit to bringing up issues proactively

⤴ Decisions

    Brainstorm:

    • Open Discussion - request feedback

    • Projects to review: FAS, CEA, YSB, FRMS, SDF