Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current Restore this Version View Version History

« Previous Version 3 Next »

\uD83D\uDDD3 Date

\uD83D\uDC65 Participants

\uD83E\uDD45 Goals

  • Collectively look at the work done in FY24 and focus on gathering feedback on how our team works moving forward

\uD83D\uDDE3 Discussion topics

Item

Presenter

Notes

Expectation Setting

Becki and Netal

  • Key Message (Netal):

    • Goal is to collectively look at the work done in FY24 and focus on gathering feedback on how our team works moving forward

    • Let’s focus on items within our control

    • We are not looking at current process for review - discussing specific themes

  • Meeting Format

    • What are the action items to improve on these themes?

    • 5 minutes to discuss gap (Netal)

    • 15 minutes to discuss solutions/action items (Becki to Moderate)

Topics

Team

  • Versioning Strategy and Accountability

    • Gaps and Problems:

      • There is not currently a defined versioning strategy that is being used

    • Questions:

      • What’s the difference between versioning and tagging?

        • Tagging

          • aliasing a pointer to a specific instance of an artifact

    • Action Items

      • Team needs to define, document, and standardize:

        • Action Items for Chris Cadden and Jesús Rangel - Document Outsystems vs. Non-Outsystems, including definitions and vocabulary

      • In depth Dependencies Planning and team agreement

        • Potential idea: More frequent releases

          • Not stacking multiple releases

            • Increases amount of bugs and time pressure

          • Outsystems can slow down based on smaller releases

        • Need to determine what features can be worked on simultaneously

  • Idea/Question: How do we get to the state of more frequent releases

    • Focus on this idea as we move forward - we want to get to this state

    • Is branching possible?

      • This is limited within Outsystems

  • Documentation and Accountability

    • Dev Documentation (Design checklist)

      • Needs to be created for OS and non-OS projects

      • Accountability needed - documentation alone is not OK, we need to commit

    • Project Management (Project Plans)

    • Testing (UAT Documentation)

    • Feedback:

      • Question: Will Grecia be involved in Design checklists?

        • Yes - Great idea

      • Outsystems' selling point is reusable components - we can leverage this

        • WebDev doesn’t have standardized component library

          • Everyone - document successful tools and reusable resources

      • Thinking point for the Devs: What is the best way to track or document shared components as more are added

        • Outsystems - Internal Forge and documentation on best practices

  • Technical Debt and Accountability

    • Estimation

      • Lessons Learned from SDF and CEA

      • Where were the Gaps?

      • Devs need to “Get Real” on estimates (lovingly)

      • Team should be mindful about not taking on too many projects

    • Commitments

    • Roles & Responsibilities

    • Defect Reduction

  • Deployments and Accountability

  • Standards and Accountability

    • Development Standards (Outsystems)

      • Design and Implementation

      • Security and Accessibility

        • All teams developing applications and testing need to be responsible and accountable for Security Planning and standards

✅ Action items

Versioning Strategy and Accountability

Documentation and Accountability

  • Chris Cadden to review the design standard documents in the weekly dev meeting
    • Development team MUST adhere to defined processes
  • Chris Cadden to collaborate with Grecia to formalize standard documentation of design
  • Team to commit to documenting reusable, successful tools in the moment
  • Netal Patel and dev team to prioritize working with OutSystems to research/spin up an internal forge
  • Selene Gutierrez and QA team to create standard documentation on process and templates/checklist for UAT
  • Team to help Rebecca Schneider make Project Plan a core part of the process

Standards and Accountability

Technical Debt and Accountability

⤴ Decisions

    Brainstorm:

    • Open Discussion - request feedback

    • Projects to review: FAS, CEA, YSB, FRMS, SDF

0 Comments

You are not logged in. Any changes you make will be marked as anonymous. You may want to Log In if you already have an account.