Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Info

Contact the Enterprise Architecture (EA) Team for support.

...

  1. Identify the Level 1 and Level 2 Capabilities on the BCM supported by the service or topic.

  2. Delete the help text from the template and use that column as well.

  3. Transfer your identified capabilities to the corresponding top rows in the capabilities table.

  4. Insert or delete columns in the table as needed. Merge cells for the Level 1 capabilities with multiple Level 2 capabilities under them, as in the Example Capability Map.

...

Image RemovedImage Added

Add Level 3 Capabilities to the Table (Optional)

  1. Work with departments to define Level 3 capabilities falling under each of the Level 2 capabilities. Define Level 3 capabilities to refine your understanding of how the University gets work done. Enter Level 3 capabilities in the rows under each Level 2 capability, as in the example. Do not connect services directly to Level 3 capabilities because that is overly complex. It is possible that some departments already have this well-defined.

  2. Rows may be inserted or deleted from the table to accommodate the number of Level 3 capabilities needed.

  3. That completes the capability table on this slide.

  4. NOTE: Complete the TIME Portfolio Assessment and the Road Map Diagram before returning to this slide to connect the “components” to the capabilities.

Image RemovedImage Added

Connect Components to Capabilities

...

The X-Axis: Business Fitness
Represents how well the component supports the business based on the following attributes.

  1. Business Functional Fit: How well the component supports business capabilities or processes from a user perspective. 

  2. Information: How well the component will maintain data quality, privacy, and timeliness.

  3. Future Potential: How well the component will support future known business requirements.

  4. Cost: How manageable the expenses are to acquire, operate, maintain, and improve functionality.

...

The Quadrants: TIME Categories
Represent the TIME model rating based on the value of x-business fitness and y-technical fitness.
Evaluate - Under review. Not implemented and not TIME rated.
Tolerate - An acceptable level of technical debt and risk relative to business value. Tolerate until cost-effective to re-engineer.
Invest - Strong business value and technical fit. Invest in innovation.
Migrate - Significant remediation needed. Migrate to alternate technologies to provide equivalent business value.
Eliminate - No longer needed. Archive data and remove technology.

TIME Category Ratings (TFV=Technical Fitness Value, BFV-Business Fitness Value)
Tolerate - Business Fitness=1-2.99 | Technical Fitness=3-5
Invest - Business Fitness=3-5 | Technical Fitness=3-5
Migrate - Business Fitness=3-59 | Technical Fitness=1-2.99
Eliminate - Business Fitness=1-2.99 | Technical Fitness=1-2.99

...

Component Color: TIME Model Rating
The component marker color represents the TIME model lifecycle rating.

Evaluate - Under review. Not implemented and not TIME rated.
Tolerate - An acceptable level of technical debt and risk relative to business value. Tolerate until cost-effective to re-engineer.
Invest - Strong business value and technical fit. Invest in innovation.
Migrate - Significant remediation needed. Migrate to alternate technologies to provide equivalent business value.
Eliminate - No longer needed. Archive data and remove technology.

...