...

There is still more to do here

Fix SPEC.

The spec is incorrect as of early September. We always need to escalate when going for a secondary approver. We only do not escalate if the primary approver was the START admininstrator.

Revise Visio.

The Visio that concerns escalation is incorrect, and needs to always escalate.

Revise Word spec.

Anytime the text spec talks about secondary approvers it needs to be rewritten to mention that we are always escalating on secondary approvers.

Questions

TWO PTAEO case, where ORGS are different.

TWO PTAEO case, where ORGS are different, but approvers are the same. As written, the SPEC says that if there are two separate ORG codes given in the two-PTAEO workflow, there should be two approvals sought, one from each ORG, and the workflow cannot move forward unless both approvals are granted.

However, many ORGs have the same set of approvers. I think we should revise the SPEC such that we merge the TWO PTAEO case to the ONE PTAEO case if and when the approvers for the separate ORGs are the same, not ONLY when the ORG codes are the same. In fact, the approvers will be the same when the ORG codes are the same, so we use this specific case as the general case.