Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

\uD83D\uDC65 Participants

\uD83E\uDD45 Goals

  • Collectively look at the work done in FY24 and focus on gathering feedback on how our team works moving forward

...

Item

Presenter

Notes

Expectation Setting

Becki and Netal

  • Key Message (Netal):

    • Goal is to collectively look at the work done in FY24 and focus on gathering feedback on how our team works moving forward

    • Let’s focus on items within our control

    • We are not looking at current process for review - discussing specific themes

  • Meeting Format

    • What are the action items to improve on these themes?

    • 5 minutes to discuss gap (Netal)

    • 15 minutes to discuss solutions/action items (Becki to Moderate)

Topics

Team

  • Versioning Strategy and Accountability

    • Gaps and Problems:

      • There is not currently a defined versioning strategy that is being used

    • Questions:

      • What’s the difference between versioning and tagging?

        • Tagging

          • aliasing a pointer to a specific instance of an artifact

    • Action Items

      • Team needs to define, document, and standardize:

        • Action Items for Chris Cadden and Jesús Rangel - Document Outsystems vs. Non-Outsystems, including definitions and vocabulary

      • In depth Dependencies Planning and team agreement

        • Potential idea: More frequent releases

          • Not stacking multiple releases

            • Increases amount of bugs and time pressure

          • Outsystems can slow down based on smaller releases

        • Need to determine what features can be worked on simultaneously

  • Idea/Question: How do we get to the state of more frequent releases

    • Focus on this idea as we move forward - we want to get to this state

    • Is branching possible?

      • This is limited within Outsystems

  • Documentation and Accountability

    • Dev Documentation (Design checklist)

      • Needs to be created for OS and non-OS projects

      • Accountability needed - documentation alone is not OK, we need to commit

    • Project Management (Project Plans)

    • Testing (UAT Documentation)

    • Feedback:

      • Question: Will Grecia be involved in Design checklists?

        • Yes - Great idea

      • Outsystems' selling point is reusable components - we can leverage this

        • WebDev doesn’t have standardized component library

          • Everyone - document successful tools and reusable resources

      • Thinking point for the Devs: What is the best way to track or document shared components as more are added

        • Outsystems - Internal Forge and documentation on best practices

  • Technical Debt and Accountability

    • Estimation

      • Lessons Learned from SDF and CEA

      • Where were the Gaps?

      • Devs need to “Get Real” on estimates (lovingly)

      • Team should be mindful about not taking on too many projects

    • Commitments

    • Roles & Responsibilities

    • Defect Reduction

  • Deployments and Accountability

  • Standards and Accountability

    • Development Standards (Outsystems)

      • Design and Implementation

      • Security and Accessibility

        • All teams developing applications and testing need to be responsible and accountable for Security Planning and standards

✅ Action items

Versioning Strategy and Accountability

Documentation and Accountability

  •  Chris Cadden to review the design standard documents in the weekly dev meeting
    •  Development team MUST adhere to defined processes
  •  Chris Cadden to collaborate with Grecia to formalize standard documentation of design
  •  Team to commit to documenting reusable, successful tools in the moment
  •  Netal Patel and dev team to prioritize working with OutSystems to research/spin up an internal forge
  •  Selene Gutierrez and QA team to create standard documentation on process and templates/checklist for UAT
  •  Team to help Rebecca Schneider make Project Plan a core part of the process

Standards and Accountability

Technical Debt and Accountability

⤴ Decisions

    Brainstorm:

    • Open Discussion - request feedback

    • Projects to review: FAS, CEA, YSB, FRMS, SDF